I had a hard time with this book. On struggling through the early
chapters, I was ready to put the book down. It was of risk of addition to those
books that I did not finish. In persisting, the book revealed some good
elements.
The biggest issue I had with it was a lack of depth of
development of the central notion central of the book – that the author had not
satisfactorily identified men as ‘wild at heart’.
Then there was the author’s selection of Biblical text – a
mix from worthy versions like NIV and NKJV and then from the paraphrased work
of The Message. Why can’t a single Bible version be chosen? On choosing a Bible
version could it be used consistently?
I felt that the author did some discredit to his argument
that men were wild at heart. It is one thing to build the argument using
positive measures (which included some good Biblical exposition) yet it is
another to try to build the argument in the negative – by making some glib
references to men’s dissatisfaction of being tied daily to a work desk.
The book does have some very worthy parts. In Chapter Nine,
set well within an structured argument, is this gem:
“Against the flesh,
the traitor within, a warrior uses discipline. We have a two-dimensional
version of this now, which we call a “quiet time”. But most men have a hard
time sustaining any sort of devotional life because it has no vital connection
to recovering and protecting their strength; it feels about as important as
flossing. But if you saw your life as a great battle and you knew you needed time with God for your
very survival, you would do it.”
That quote is a gem in that it aptly uses analogy and in its
recognition of the Christian walk as a spiritual battle. The analogy matches
“quiet time” to flossing – men need complete both and yet they both seem
laborious. The general perception is that they both pay poorly on the
effort/reward spectrum. The spiritual battle identifies with God’s daily
provision to a Christian to allow endurance in the battle. And, note how the
author identifies “quiet time” as two-dimensional as a means of alluding to the
day when Christian comes into Christ’s glory to enjoy devotional time of three
or four or more dimensions.
In developing the argument through to the quote listed
above, I appreciate how the author recognised the distinction between
justification and sanctification. On receiving Christ into your life
justification is offered fully. Sanctification is not offered fully at first.
Where justification is instant and complete, sanctification is gradual and
never fulfilled in this life. The author identifies the gradualness of
sanctification to the Old Testament – a parallel to the story of taking the
promised land and sustaining control of it. So, Joshua’s conquest of Jericho
is likened to sanctification in that God had required that the people fight for
possession of their land. King David’s reign is likened to sanctification in that
David had to exercise, and maintain, disciplined systems (systems of justice
and economics and security).
Overall, I was glad I persisted through the whole of the
book.
Shalom,
Ozhamada
The book’s full title is: Wild at Heart; Discovering the secret of a man’s soul; Elderedge, John; 2001, Thomson Nelson, Inc. Paperback,
220 pages
[532 words] #jesus #heisrisen #book #reading #read #wildatheart #bible #life

No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are most welcome. It would be most arrogant of me to think that my opinion, or my research, is 100% sound. Your comments shape and build this work.
I have made edits (and whole post deletions) based on feedback of others. I will continue to do so.