Rise Warrior Rise - Awaken Your Soul troubles me. It troubles as I’ve long known the risk of such a book. Let me explain with an illustration from a church service…
Many years ago, I was at a
Christian church in Sydney. There was a children’s talk at the fifteen-minute
mark of the service. The children’s talk was offered by a man. The man was
dressed as a chef. He wore the full chef outfit including the toque. The talk he
offered was about making a cake. He demonstrated how one made a cake by
starting with a bowl. To the bowl he added flour, then sugar, then oil. Next,
he added some chocolate and a dash of vanilla. At that point he stirred the
mixture and spoke of how God has given us a wonderful recipe of how to live our
lives.
Then the story turned.
The chef next added soil to the bowl, and then worms, and then some cut grass. He then added some pencil shavings and some finger nail clippings.
And then he stirred the mixture. He delivered the main point of his story:
That which God provides – the sweet cake mixture – is spoiled by us when we try to add to God’s message. We all tend to want to create our own recipe for life and in doing so we deviate from the maker’s design and end up with a mess.
That’s the trouble of Rise Warrior Rise.
It is a recipe that makes a mess. Its odd combination of 'friends are like undies' (p113), and adoration of Krishna (page 323) - the cut grass and the finger nail clipping.
As a result of the collection of such oddities the book is like a cruise liner that promises tropical island passage yet never leaves a filthy working harbour.
![]() |
| From pexels.com; free and unattributable |
And, then there are the slights – “every children is born good” (page 58) – which is a sensitivity to the Christian recognition that only God is good - and, the notion of praying without any indication of whom to direct prayer (page 85).
And, the peculiar language; “giving everything up to become
full-time practitioners” (page 125) when it should be “giving everything else
up to…”; “divorce too is contagious” (page 125) as if divorce is a disease.
The book needs a stronger structure and deep hooks to science. It jumps too quickly from thin references to research findings to opinion. Where the book could offer some engaging consideration of the subject matter it never rises above the surface.
The book is not psychology - as its classification on library shelves would suggest - but pop psych.
The book’s blurb promises “cutting edge science” yet the reader gets potpourri.
Avoid this book and stick with a best seller from within the same genre, one like Think and Grow Rich.

No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are most welcome. It would be most arrogant of me to think that my opinion, or my research, is 100% sound. Your comments shape and build this work.
I have made edits (and whole post deletions) based on feedback of others. I will continue to do so.